Image 1 of 2

A Texas judge has cleared the way for an arbitration panel to 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:review the $12 million in bonuses paid by SCA Promotions to 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Lance Armstrong before admitting he used♐ performance-enhancing drugs.

Judge Tonya Parker has decided not to stop the panel from considering whether the Dallas-based agency should be repaid the bonuses it awarded Armstrong fo🐈r three of his seven Tour de France victories.

Jeff Tillotson, an attorney for 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:SCA Promotions, said on Wednesday that the panel is set to meet next month to conꦜsider his request for the repayment of $12 million in bonuses and penalties for lying under oath by Armstrong.

SCA Promotions filed one of several lawsuits against Ar🧸mstrong after he admitted to doping.

Court win

While the SCA ruling is a further blow to Armstrong as he faces several lawsuits, a Los Angeles judge dismissed a fraud lawsuit, ruling꧅ that he engaged in mere "puffery" and not illegal false advertising when claiming that FRS energy products were his secret weapon for success.

In 2013, Armstrong was sued by a group of FRS consumers who sought more than $5 million♛ from FRS and Ar꧃mstrong for misleading them into buying their products, which include energy drinks.

Armstrong claimed the products were his "secret weapon" behind his seven consecutive Tour wins when in fact doping was hi🎉s real secret weapon, accor🎉ding to their suit. The plaintiffs argued that if they had known the truth about his doping, they would not have bought FRS products.

Federal judge Beverly Reid O'Connell disagreed with the plaintiffs' argument. "The court finds that defendants' statements about a 'secret weapon' constitute non-actiona🐭ble puffery," she wrote in her ruling.

Puffery is a legal concept that relates to advertising, a notion that companies can make exaggerated or boastful subjective♕ claims about their products and not be held liable for literal definitions about them.

Armstrong was a spokesman an🎐d part owner of FRS and helped the company grow five-fold at the height of his fame, the suit st🌄ates.

After do🔯ping evidence mounted againsꦿt him in 2012, FRS parted ways with Armstrong and several other spokepeople.

The suit against FRS was filed against Armstrong a month after his admission during an interview with Oprah Winfrey televised in ♉January of last year.

Armstrong attorney Zia Modabber is reported as saying that the FRS case was "opportunistic" and an exa🐈mple of "kicking a guy when he's down."

Five lawsuits have been filed against Armstrong in the aftermath of his 𒉰confession. Two of lawsuits remain: a suit filed by the federal government on behalf of the U.S. Postal Servไice and the suit by a SCA Promotions.