The news that Alberto Contador has been cleared by the Royal Spanish Cycling Federation on﷽ charges of doping and has had his proposed one-year ban scrapped has sent shock waves through the sport. Here are a selection of opinions from within cycling’s press room.

Daniel Friebe, Procycling European Editor and Cyclingnews correspondent
My feeling is that this case (and more generally article 296 of the UCI’s regulations) sets an extremely dangerous precedent. The UCI couldn’t show conclusively that Contador had deliberately taken clenbuterol? OK, does that mean the same now applies when a rider tests positive for EPO? Does the testing or judging authority now have to produce a blood-spattered syringe as well as the electropherogram that used to suffice?

The decision to clear Contador of doping charges is, on the face of it, an absolute farce. The strict liability rule in the WADA code means that it doesn't matter how a banned substance gets into an athlete's꧙ body, its presence there is enough to warrant a sanction. Otherwise what is the🌳 point of having such a rule?

There was no doubt that there was clenbuterol in Contador's samওple. The amount detected was small but well within the detection limits. He didn't dispute this. H♊e also wasn't able to prove without a doubt that he inadvertently ingested clenbuterol - and in the case of strict liability, the burden of proof lies with the athlete. Where's the steak?

This whole decision smacks of the Spanish federation not wanting to lose face in the wake of yet another of its top cyclists tes🗹ting positive or otherwise being linked to doping. The UCI and/or WADA must appeal this deꦐcision to maintain any credibility in the fight against doping.

Richard Moore, journalist and author
The Contador case has seemed odd right from day one. Indeed, there has been so much about it that has seemed strange that it is almost no surprise that it appears to have reached such a bizarre r🌃esolution.

From the time delay between the test and the announcement, and the suspicion that efforts were going on behind-the-scenes by those in power to find an explanation, rather than to follow due process, to Contador’s contaminated steak explanation, to the time it then took the Spanish Federation to "sancti𒆙on" him, this has been no ordinary doping case.

And the biggest concern is that this is because Contador is no ordinary athlete. It lays the UCI and the S🦩panish federation open to the charge that they have handled it differently on account of Contador’s fame, his standing, and the damage his conviction would do to the image of the sport.

Whether it has been "resolved" is doubtful, of course. It will drag on. But that almost doesn’t matt💯er. The stink left by the irregularities in the way the Contador case has been handled remains, now more pungent than ever.

Peter Cossins, former editor at Procycling Magazine
Having followed press, public and political reaction to Alberto Contador’s ban in recent weeks, the news that the three-time Tour de France winner has effectively been cleared of doping comes as little surprise. The clamour for his absolution had been building steadily, and once the Spanish prime minister, the leader of the opposition and several other key political figures threw their weight behind Contador, it was always likely that the Spanish federation would move in his favour.

Daniel Schmalz
As someone who satirizes professional c✱ycling, I appreciate the unusual and the bizarre. Vanishing twins, blood bags labelled according to pet names, Mark Cavendish talking — these are the things that make my job easy. But professional cycling is entering into a realm where the truth is becoming stranger than anything I can conjure.

It appears that Alberto Contador will be cleared of charges stemming from his positive test for clenbuterol. Contador has claimed that the positive test resulted from eating tainted beef, yet wasn't able to produced any "mystery meat" that would've exonerated him.

So we have the Spanish Prime Minister tweeting in the defence of a racer using a dubious t𒁏ainted meat defence and an 💜RFEC mailing mishap to get his already shortened sentence reduced to nothing. Bravo, Spain, you've come up with a scenario so implausible that I couldn't have imagined it in my wildest fantasies. PS, good luck with the CAS.

William Fotheringham, journalist and author
Whatever the arguments over clenbuterol levels and contaminated steaks, the Contador ruling underlines one thing above all. National governing bodies should not be placed in a position where they have to rule on positive drug tests involving their star riders, any more than the world governing body. Between them the UCI and RFEC have taken four and a half months to arrive at… no ruling at alꦓl. As I expected from the outset, it is most likely that CAS will eventually make the decision for them.

The fact that even before explaining their decision to clear Contador the RFEC issued a statement saying they had come under no pressure to absolve him speaks volumes: clearly they felt they had better get their denial in first. The problem is simply this. If a ruling is taken by a body that has an economic interest in the outcome of doping cases, be it the UCI or a national governi𝓡ng body, accusations of conflict of interest can always be made.

To avoid that, the only solution is an independent panel to rule on anti-doping cases involving riders in the higher echelon of teams.
WADA may not be that body, but surely it could appoint the members.

If there’s no proof, then the hypothesis of contaminated steak is just that, a theory. I’ve never understood the certainty Contador attached to the rogue stea🎶k explanation. Surely if Clenbuterol was ingested by accident it could equally com🎉e via contaminated milk, some ham or a spiked drink?

Far from being the end of the matter, this could well go beyond cycling, the Tour de Fran🐼ce and Spain. Because if there’s no proof where the Clenbuterol came from, then it marks a fundamental rejection of the WADA Code and its principle of "strict liability". The internationally accepted seꦰt of rules are being ignored and it’ll be interesting to see what the UCI, WADA and even the IOC do next.

This is cycling's version of the OJ Simpson verdict. Everyone expected a conviction, suddenly Contador&rꦛsquo;s in the clear. After six months oꩵf investigation there are still more questions than answers.